Airlines:
Sympathy Yes, Bailout No
by Larry Elder
The
nations airlines seek a multi-billion-dollar "emergency
aid package" in response to September 11s terrorist attacks.
The situation certainly looks grim. American Airlines intends to lay
off some 20,000 employees, with United Airlines expected to lay off
20,000.
The
former chairman of American Airlines said, "My guess is that
the airlines will have to raise something between $10 [billion] to
$11 billion on the low side and perhaps $25 billion on the high side,
of new cash. Now thats simply more than the airline industry
on its own can manage."
The answer is "no."
Remember, while Congress passed an "Authorization for Use of
Military Force," it made no declaration of war. True, as the
airlines argue, the federal government made them ground all aviation
for a period of several days. But can you imagine the CEO, upon learning
of Tuesdays terrorist attacks, saying to the company, "Keep
em flying, boys"? No, any responsible, self-respecting
CEO failing to issue such an order faced the possibility of disaster
given the colossal uncertainly during those critical hours and day.
After
all, passengers expect the airlines themselves to provide some measure
of safety. Nothing prevented the airlines from instituting some
safety procedures we now belatedly consider. According to Washington
Times columnist Peter Hannaford, it took no federal law
for a United Airlines captain to instruct passengers, on last Saturdays
flight out of Denver International, what to do.
The captain said, "I want to thank you brave folks for coming
out today. We dont have any new instructions from the federal
government, so from now on were on our own
. Sometimes
a potential hijacker will announce that he has a bomb. There are
no bombs on this aircraft and if someone were to get up and make
that claim, dont believe him.
"If someone were to stand up, brandish something such as a
plastic knife and say This is a hijacking or words to
that effect, here is what you should do: Every one of you should
stand up and immediately throw things at that personpillows,
books, magazines, eyeglasses, shoesanything that will throw
him off balance and distract his attention. If he has a confederate
or two, do the same with them. Most important: Get a blanket over
him, then wrestle him to the floor and keep him there. Well
land the plane at the nearest airport and the authorities will take
it from there.
"Remember, there will be one of him and maybe a few confederates,
but there are 200 of you. You can overwhelm them
." Not
bad, given the lack of guidance by the Feds.
Supporters of the airline bailout point to the "successful"
Chrysler bailout. Successful? From the time Chairman Lee Iacocca
pulled the company back from the brink, it consistently got into
financial difficulties. In 1998, Daimler-Benz bought Chrysler, but
suppose more than two decades ago Congress had allowed Chrysler
to fail. Would Ford or Chevrolet have scooped up their assets, producing
a more efficient and productive domestic automotive industry?
If Congress bails out the airlines, what about others directly affected
by the terrorist attacks? Certainly, the tourism business, hotels,
restaurants, and financial services all took direct hits. CNNs
Garrick Utley estimates that in New York alone, the attack closed
permanently or temporarily disrupted some 43,000 businesses from
large to mom-and-pops. Do they get aid too?
Also, the terrorist attacks likely permanently changed peoples
willingness to fly. Many Israelis, for example, simply go out a
lot less because they feel safer at home. If people decide to fly
less often, should taxpayers step in and make up for the shortfall?
Chapter 11 allows a company with financial difficulties to continue
operating while shielded from creditors. The airline CEOs could
take to the media airwaves and explain their financial difficulties,
and make a direct appeal to consumers: Buy an airline ticket now,
even if you intend to fly much later. If Americans deem the airlines
plight legitimate, expect them to open their hearts and wallets
as they have done for the American Red Cross and countless other
charities and fundraisers set up for post-Tuesday disaster relief.
Besides, airlines began suffering before September 11, given the
softness of the economy. Airlines, even in the best of times, remain
a notoriously cyclical business with thin profit margins. Did the
CEOs base their request on the disaster of Tuesday, or to mask earlier
structural problems management failed to heed?
Remember Founding Father James Madison, the principal author of
the Constitution, who said, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger
on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress
of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents
"
Certainly, the bailout spells good politics. But it is in the heat
of emotion that good people must remember to stand on principle.
|